|
Click Here
for more articles
|
About the author:
.
Circulated by Article Emporium
|
|
|
Outside The Box
|
|
by:
Phillip A. Ross
|
Outside The Box
Thinking "outside the box" or as it is sometimes called, "coloring
outside the lines" is a popular idea in the business world today.
People and organizations are told to think outside the box or color
outside the lines as a way to stimulate creativity when they need to
solve problems like streamlining production, establishing a new
product, or developing a new process. And it's true that creativity and
innovation often arise from unexpected and unconventional thinking.
But there is a serious problem with trying to apply such thinking too
broadly.
For instance, creativity is valued in art and advertising, but not in
banking and accounting. An accounting firm recently ran an ad
suggesting that it could think "outside the box." Do you really want
your business to be associated with creative accounting? Aren't
accountants supposed to put the numbers in the right box? Wasn't
creative accounting a serious problem for Enron?
In reality, clear thinking and the creativity that it produces are
rarely a matter of thinking outside the box. And coloring outside the
lines is for the most part just sloppy workmanship. The art of clear
thinking is a matter of putting thoughts in to the right boxes or
categories. Clear thinking is a matter of mental organization.
Conversely, sloppy thinking involves the confusion of categories, of
putting ideas into the wrong boxes or not putting them in order at all.
Is a child who will not straighten his or her room creative or just
sloppy? There is a significant difference. While creativity sometimes
looks sloppy to an outside observer, it does not issue from sloppiness.
Picasso was a creative artist.
But his creativity was not a matter of the art he produced. In reality
his abstract work is technically sloppy. It looks like the work of a
child. Picasso could sell his abstract art only because he had
previously established himself as an artist who could color inside the
lines very well. Had he not first proven his artistic talent in the
traditional way, his abstract art would have been worth much less. He
used his reputation as a traditional artist to establish a new
direction in art. He didn't so much color outside the box, as he
expanded the boundaries and definition of the box. But the point is
that his abstract creations were valuable only because of his proven
abilities in the traditional arts.
Contrast my own efforts to establish myself as an abstract artist. My
art has gone unnoticed because I have not been able to prove myself as
a traditional artist. Not that I actually tried to do so, but I am
using myself as an example to make the point. The creativity of a novel
idea requires the discipline of order and structure to be valuable.
Picasso's art is valuable because he was an accomplished painter who
intentionally colored outside the lines. My art is not valuable because
I am not an accomplished painter and I accidentally color outside the
lines. While the two products may look similar, the difference is
critical.
Creativity is more than breaking the rules.
Similarly, Joseph Heller was able to break the rules of English grammar
in his book, Something Happened (Scribner, 1974), only because he was
intimately familiar with them. Having taught English at the University
of South Carolina, he was a master of grammar. And only out of his
expertise could he creatively exploit, expand and redefine the
boundaries of grammar. And so it is with regard to thinking outside the
box.
Thinking outside the box apart from being able to think inside the box
is worthless.
Such thought is just plain sloppy. Thus, the suggestion that creativity
lies in the ability to think outside the box is mostly nonsense.
Creativity issues from talent, ability and discipline. Talent must be
forged and shaped on the anvil of discipline in order to develop
ability. Great ability is always the result of study, discipline and
practice.
Creativity is more a matter of seeing that the boxes themselves are
inadequate and suggesting a better arrangement or a better definition.
Creativity doesn't simply discard the boxes, it redefines and/or
rearranges them after becoming intimately familiar with them. Real
creativity is always the fruit of discipline and order. Creativity, in
order to be genuinely creative and not simply sloppy disorganization,
must emerge out of discipline and order as an intentional effort.
While a creative idea often comes unbidden out of unexpected places, it
requires discipline, study and order to make something of it. Apart
from discipline and order, what passes for creativity is nonsense, and
to suggest otherwise actually undermines and/or weakens the creative
process.
What does this mean for our industry? Distributors and suppliers should
apply themselves to mastering the basics before attempting to break the
rules in the name of creativity. Don't start outside the box. First,
establish your ability to think within the box. Master the rules before
you suggest breaking them. For example, before a distributorship
presents a wild, innovative concept to a client for a campaign, it
should first establish its expertise with campaigns and/or ideas that
have a track record of yielding good ROI. Designers, artists, and copy
writers should establish their mastery of basics before experimenting
outside the box. For the most part the important stuff is inside the
box.
©2002 Phillip A. Ross
|
|